Backup proves copies exist. DR provides recovery paths. Cyber recovery platforms clean the environment. None of them produce the safe-resume decision. Here is where each one stops, and where Cybersnap.io begins.
Each lane represents how long it takes the layer to produce a defensible recovery decision after ransomware hits. The clock is running.
Four real categories. Four different jobs. Cybersnap.io is the missing layer that turns the others' outputs into a safe-resume decision.
Backups, snapshots, restore paths, scan results, IoC reports. All correct. None of them tell you which restore point is safe to bring back right now. The decision still falls to the team in the war room.
Cybersnap.io reads the others' outputs alongside production evidence and produces one confidence-scored decision: safe to resume, requires investigation, or unsafe to resume. Tied to a specific recovery point. Auditable.
It sits on top of it. Storage provides snapshots. Backup provides copies. DR provides paths. Cyber recovery cleans the environment. Cybersnap.io takes all of it and produces the safe-resume decision.
Cybersnap.io reads from your storage, backup, DR, and cyber recovery tools. No rip-and-replace. Connector-based.
Multi-signal correlation across files, snapshots, identity, anomaly patterns, and time. Six detection layers, one verdict.
Confidence-scored safe-resume decision the recovery team can act on. Auditable, evidence-backed, in minutes.
Slide your environment size and downtime cost. The estimator shows the avoidable cost of a manual recovery decision versus Cybersnap.io. Conservative defaults from industry analyst data.
Downtime saved: 11h 56m. Based on $900/min downtime cost (Financial Services) and the difference between a 12-hour manual recovery and a 4-minute Cybersnap.io decision.
Book a briefing. We will map Cybersnap.io against the specific stack you run and show exactly where the safe-resume decision currently lives, and where it would live with us.